Morphogenesis is one of the most important themes in biology, and is also central to
nonequilibrium physics. The issue is understanding how
local interaction of elementary components leads to collective behavior
and the formation of a highly organized system. In living nature, this
self-organization is found on many different scales, from single cells
to schools of fish and herds of animals. The collective dynamics of
populations of microorganisms has attracted significant attention in
recent years both in the biological and physics communities. Collective
behavior leads to significant selective advantages for bacteria.
Many species of bacteria form biofilms on various surfaces in
order to resist environmental stresses. Biofilms are commonly present
in natural environments such as living tissues, the surface of rocks
and soils, or aquatic systems, but they can also be found in human-made
systems and devices, such as industrial piping, artificial implants, etc.
Understanding biofilm formation involves a variety of physical, chemical
and biological issues, such as microorganism chemotaxis, motility,
cell-cell signaling, attachment, substrate effects, gene regulation, etc.
In this work [1] we focus on the growth and ordering of
dense colonies of rod-shaped bacteria Escherichia coli in well-controlled
environments. Quantitative study of this process is essential for
elucidation of the physical and biological properties of biofilms.
We use strains of E. coli that lack flagella in our
experimental studies of bacterial colony growth. Initially, small
population of cells ( 10^2- 10^3 cells) is inserted in
specially designed microfluidic cavities and supplied with the necessary
carbon sources to facilitate growth. Growth of the cells can be controlled
by regulating the concentration of the carbon source (e.g. glucose) in the
nutrient flow. The colony structure is observed and recorded using
high-throughput microscopy and analyzed using specially designed software.
Microfluidic devices are designed and fabricated
using well established techniques[5]. Microfluidic devices
are generally restricted to the laminar flow regime primarily due to
the fact that the driving pressure required to initiate and maintain
turbulent flows are unfeasible at the microscale. We use differential
pressure as a means of driving the flow, either by hydrostatic (gravity)
or mechanical (syringe pump) methods. For device fabrication, we
use replica molding of poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a transparent
(down to light at ~250 nm) elastomeric rubber. Details of the
fabrication may be found elsewhere [6].
To model the proliferation of
cells in a microfluidic environment, we generalized the algorithm
which we developed earlier to describe the dynamics of granular rods
[2]. The algorithm is based on the well-known method
of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [3] which is
widely used in different areas of statistical physics. The main idea
of the method is to follow the dynamics of individual ``particles''
which constitute the system under study. In the case of a gas these
particles are molecules, and in the case of granular material each
particle represent a particular grain. The motion of every particle
is described by Newton's equations for translational and
rotational degrees of freedom. Details of their motion depend on the
structure of the particles, their mutual interaction, and on the
external forces/torques exerted on every particle. The main
difficulty of the method lies in determining all of the contacts and
computing the contact forces. To compute the forces, we employ a soft-particle
MD simulation technique which allows for overlaps between
the particles. More details of the methods of effective contact
detection and computation of the contact forces may be found in our
earlier work on dynamics of anisotropic granular particles
[2,4].
Quicktime Movie (2.4 Mb) (Quicktime Player/ MPlayer)
Microfluidic experiment: growth of a bacterial colony from uniformly distributed randomly-oriented cells in an open channel.
The panels show snapshots of the population taken at t=0min, 40min, 80min, 120min
| a |
b |
 |
 |
| c |
d |
 |
 |
Quicktime Movie (3.3 Mb) (Quicktime Player/ MPlayer)
Microfluidic experiment: growth of a bacterial colony from a small clump of cells in an open channel. The panels show snapshots of the population
taken at t =2.7h, 3.3h, 4.0h, 4.7h
| a |
b |
i |
 |
| c |
d |
 |
 |
Quicktime Movie (8 Mb) (Quicktime Player/ MPlayer)
MD simulations: growth of a colony from the initial strip with random orientations in an open channel. The panels show snapshots of the population taken at t=0.0, 2.7, 4.2, 14.2. The "cells" are colorized according to their orientation with respect to walls, from blue (perpendicular) to red (parallel).
| a |
b |
 |
 |
| c |
d |
 |
 |
Quicktime Movie (3.7 Mb) (Quicktime Player/ MPlayer)
Results of MD simulations for the colony growth in a closed container. The
growth is limited by four rigid walls. The size of the square domain
is Lx=Lz=136.6d where d is the cell diameter. a-c:
Initially the colony is prepared by placing randomly oriented cells of
different length in the middle section. The panels show snapshots of the
population taken at t=5.0, 15.0, 30.0. The cells are colorized
according to the value of the contact stress.
 |
 |
 |
Quicktime Movie (4.6 Mb) (Quicktime Player/ MPlayer)
Snapshots from experiments and simulations of biofilm growth in an open
channel with flow. Experiments were conducted with E. coli XL-10 Gold over
8 hrs with a constant pressure of 10 dyn/ cm^2, and imaged at 40x
magnification. Simulations were performed in a periodic channel of size
L_x=136.6d and L_z=2 L_x. Only half of the channel is shown. Initially
the colony is prepared by placing randomly oriented cells
of different length in the middle. In the simulations, the cells are color-coded according to
their velocity normalized by the magnitude of the fluid flow, so that
blue corresponds to the cells attached to the bottom and red corresponds
to the cells passively advected by the fluid flow.
 |
[1]
D. Volfson, S. Cookson, J. Hasty, L. S. Tsimring, Biomechanical ordering of dense cell populations,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, in press (2008).
[2]
D. Volfson, A. Kudrolli, L. S. Tsimring, Anisotropy driven dynamics in vibrated granular rods,
Phys. Rev. E, 70, 051312 (2004).
[3]
D.C. Rapaport. The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[4]
S. Dorbolo, D. Volfson, L. Tsimring, A. Kudrolli,
Dynamics of a bouncing dimer,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 044101 (2005)
[5]
S. K. Sia and G. M. Whitesides,
Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies,
Electrophoresis, 24(21):3563-76, Nov 2003
[6]
S. Cookson, N. Ostroff, W. Lee Pang, D. Volfson, and J. Hasty,
Monitoring dynamics of single-cell gene expression over multiple cell cycles,
Mol. Sys. Biol.,, Novemeber, msb4100032 (2005)
For more details, see this
poster