Progress in genomic research has led to the realization
that effective models for predicting cellular behavior must take into account
the network interactions that dynamically mediate gene regulation. Since
behavior arising from these complex interactions is difficult to predict
without quantitative models, there is a need for experimentally validated
computational modeling approaches that can be used to understand the
complexities of gene regulation. Working in close collaboration with Jeff Hasty's Systems Biodynamics lab at the Bioengineering
Department, UCSD, we develop nonlinear stochastic models for the dynamics of
genetic regulatory modules and their interactions in living cells.
Some of the specific projects we are currently working on include
- Study of intrinsic and extrinsic
noise in the dynamics of genetic modules.
There is strong experimental evidence that the level of expression from the
same gene varies significantly from one cell to another within a
genetically-identical colony [Elowitz, 2002, Hasty and Collins, 2002] .
Such variations are observed in the cells of
organisms ranging in complexity from bacteria to mammals. Theoretically, with
mRNA numbers that are often less than ten, the stochastic nature of the
underlying biochemical reactions must lead to large fluctuations.
Stochasticity in gene expression is generally believed to be detrimental
to cell function because fluctuations in protein levels can corrupt
the quality of intracellular signals. One the other hand, randomness,
can provide a mechanism for phenotypic and cell-type diversification.
In order to address the issues of randomness in genetic regulation networks,
sophisticated analytical and numerical tools are being developed.
Recent studies have demonstrated that a significant component of expression variability
arises from extrinsic factors thought to influence multiple genes in
concert [M.Elowitz, 2002, 2005, Raser & O'Shea, 2005], yet the
biological origins of this extrinsic variability have received
little attention. We combine computational modeling
with fluorescence data generated from multiple promoter-gene inserts
in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify two major sources of
extrinsic variability [Volfson et al, 2006].
One unavoidable source arising from the
coupling of gene expression with population dynamics leads to a
ubiquitous noise floor in expression variability.
A second source originating from a common upstream transcription factor exemplifies
how regulatory networks can convert intrinsic or extrinsic noise in regulator
expression into extrinsic noise at the output of a target gene. Our
results highlight the importance of the interplay of gene regulatory
networks with population heterogeneity for understanding the origins
of cellular diversity.
We developed modifications to the classical Gillespie algorithm which allow it
to be emplyed for growing and dividing cells [Lu et al,
2004], as well as for non-Markovian delayed reactions [Bratsun et al, 2005].
- Role of transcriptional delays in the dynamics of genetic regulatory networks
We study the stochastic properties of gene regulation taking into account the
non-Markovian character of gene transcription and translation
[Bratsun et al, 2005]. We show that
time delay in protein production or degradation may change the behavior of the
system from stationary to oscillatory even when a deterministic counterpart of
the stochastic system exhibits no oscillations. Assuming signicant
decorrelation on the time scale of gene transcription, we deduce a truncated
master equation of the reactive system and derive an analytical expression for
the autocorrelation function of the protein concentration. For weak feedback
the theory agrees well with numerical simulations based on the modified
direct Gillespie method.
- The coupling of genetic modules.
Our research in this area builds upon previous investigations of elementarty synthetic
genetic circuits. This work includes the development of positive feedback
[Hasty et al., 2000,Isaacs et al., 2003]
and co-repressive switching networks [Gardner et al., 2000], as well as an
oscillating circuit [Elowitz and Leibler, 2000]. These previous studies have
explored several of the building-block modules that constitute large-scale
genomic wiring, and thus represent a first step towards an understanding of
whole-genome regulatory complexity. We intend to build upon these previous
studies by designing and constructing higher order networks consisting of
coupled genetic regulatory modules.
-
Study of circadian oscillations and related spatiotemporal pattern
formation in Neurospora Crassa
Neurospora Crassa, alnog with Drosofila, is one of the salient organisms
which biologists use to study the nature of circadian oscillations
[Dunlap, 1999, Lakin-Thomas, 2000].
Circadian rhythm in Neurospora can be seen in a petri dish by the periodic spore
formation in the form of bands on the agar surface (see photo below).
(photo courtesy S. Brody)
In this work we introduce and investigate a stochastic model of
spatio-temporal pattern formation in Neurospora driven by a circadian
oscillator. The local dynamics of the model is based on the delayed coupling
between two frequency gene fcc and white-collar wcc heterodimeric
complex. This model reproduces he obser4ved nearl-24h period of local
oscillations and formation of bands in the growing cell. This model can be
applied to understand the mechanisms of pattern formation in the wild-type
Neurospora crassa as well as in various Neurospora mutants.
(joint work with Stuart Brody's group
at the Biology department, UCSD)
References
- D.A. Bratsun, D.N. Volfson, L.S. Tsimring, and J. Hasty.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102, no.41, 14593-12598 (2005).
- J.C. Dunlap. Cell 96: 271-290, 1999.
- M. B. Elowitz and S. Leibler, Nature 403:335, 2000.
- T. S. Gardner, C. R. Cantor, and J. J. Collins, Nature 403: 339, 2000.
- J. Hasty, J. Pradines, M. Dolnik, and J. J. Collins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 2075, 2000.
- J. Hasty, F. Isaacs, M. Dolnik, D. McMillen, and J. J. Collins, Chaos 11: 207, 2001.
- J. Hasty and J. Collins Nature Genetics, 31 (1): 13-4, 2002.
- F. Isaacs, J. Hasty, C. Cantor, and J. J. Collins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 7714, 2003.
- P.L. Lakin-Thomas, Trends in Genetics 16: 135-142, 2000.
- T. Lu, D. Volfson, L.S. Tsimring and J. Hasty. IEE Systems Biology 1:121-127, 2004.
- J. M. Raser and E. K. O'Shea, Science 304: 1811, 2003.
-
D.Volfson, J.Marciniak, W.J. Blake, L.S. Tsimring, and J. Hasty, Nature, 439, 861-864 (16 Feb 2006).
(see also a brief review of this paper in
Nature Reviews Genetics 7, 80-81 (February 2006)
- L. S. Tsimring, D. Volfson, J. Hasty.
Modeling stochastically driven genetic circuits, Chaos, 16, 026103 (2006).